Islamic Fatwas 1346 Fatwas Available 
Fatwa | Islamic Rulings
  Important categories:     Purification     Prayer     Fasting     Charity     Pilgrimage  
Friday 24 May 2024  
Search FatwaIslam:         • Advanced Search
• Preferences

Home » Methodology

Ash-Shaikh Saalih Al-Fawzaan Discusses: Who Is An Innovator

Indeed there has appeared between the students of knowledge differing regarding the definition of the innovator. So some of them said: he (the innovator) is whoever said or did an innovation, even if the proof was not presented to him. And from among them are those who said: the proof must be established for him. And from among them are those who made a difference between the Mujtahid scholar, and others besides him from those who established their principles that are in opposition to the methodology of the People of the Sunnah and the Jamaa’ah. And there has appeared from amongst some of these statements the declaration of Ibn Hajr and An-Nawawee as innovators, and refusing to pray for mercy upon them. We seek from your eminence a clarification regarding this issue, which the discussion about it has increased. May Allaah reward you with good.

ـ لقد ظهر بين طلاب العلم اختلاف في تعريف المبتدع‏.‏‏.‏ فقال بعضهم‏:‏ هو من قال أو فعل البدعة، ولو لم تقع عليه الحجة، ومنهم من قال لابد من إقامة الحجة عليه، ومنهم من فرَّق بين العالم المجتهد وغيره من الذين أصلوا أصولهم المخالفة لمنهج أهل السنة والجماعة، وظهر من بعض هذه الأقوال تبديع ابن حجر والنووي، وعدم الترحم عليهم‏.‏‏.‏ نطلب من فضيلتكم تجلية هذه المسألة التي كثر الخوض فيها‏.‏‏.‏ جزاكم الله خيرًا‏؟‏


Firstly, it is not appropriate for the beginning students of knowledge, and others besides them from the common folk, to busy themselves with declaring people innovators (Tabdee’) and declaring people to be immoral sinners (Tafseeq). This is because it is a matter that is dangerous, and they do not have the knowledge and comprehension in this matter. Also, this causes hatred and enmity between them. Therefore, it is obligatory upon them to busy themselves with seeking knowledge, and restraining their tongues from that which contains no benefit – rather it contains harm for them, and for others besides them as well.

Secondly, innovation (Al-Bid’ah) is what has been introduced into the religion from what was not from it. This is due to the statement of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam – may prayers of blessing and peace be upon him), “Whoever introduces into this matter of ours what is not from it, then it is rejected.” [Reported by Al-Imaam Al-Bukhaaree in his Saheeh (3/167) from a narration on the authority of ‘Aa’ishah – may Allaah be pleased with her]. And if a person did something that is in opposition to the religion due to his ignorance (he simply did not know), then verily he is to be excused because of his ignorance, and he is not to be ruled an innovator (Mubtadi’). However, his action is (still) considered an innovation. Thirdly, whoever has some mistakes in matters of Ijtihaad (scholarly deduction), which some others besides him made interpretation concerning – like Ibn Hajr and An-Nawawee, and what occurred from them of interpreting some of the Attributes of Allaah – then that person is not to be ruled as an innovator. Rather, it should be said: This which occurred from them is a mistake, and it is hoped that they will be forgiven due to what they brought forth of tremendous service for the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam – may prayers of blessing and peace be upon him). So they are two great Imaams, who are reliable according to the people of knowledge.

أولاً‏ :‏ لا ينبغي للطلبة المبتدئين وغيرهم من العامة أن يشتغلوا بالتبديع والتفسيق؛ لأن ذلك أمر خطير وهم ليس عندهم علم ودراية في هذا الموضوع، وأيضًا هذا يحدث العداوة والبغضاء بينهم، فالواجب عليهم الاشتغال بطلب العلم وكف ألسنتهم عما لا فائدة فيه، بل فيه مضرة عليهم وعلى غيرهم‏.‏ ثانيًا‏:‏ البدعة‏:‏ ما أحدث في الدين مما ليس منه لقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم‏:‏ ‏(‏من أحدث في أمرنا هذا ما ليس منه فهو رد‏)‏ ‏[‏رواه الإمام البخاري في ‏"‏صحيحه‏"‏ ‏(‏3/167‏)‏ من حديث عائشة رضي الله عنها‏]‏، وإذا فعل الشيء المخالف جاهلاً فإنه يعذر بجهله ولا يحكم عليه بأنه مبتدع، لكن ما عمله يعتبر بدعة‏.‏ ثالثًا‏:‏ من كان عنده أخطاء اجتهادية تأوَّل فيها غيره كابن حجر والنووي، وما قد يقع منهما من تأويل بعض الصفات لا يحكم عليه بأنه مبتدع، ولكن يُقال‏:‏ هذا الذي حصل منهما خطأ ويرجى لهما المغفرة بما قدماه من خدمة عظيمة لسنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، فهما إمامان جليلان موثوقان عند أهل العلم‏. المنتقى من فتاوى الفوزان- الجزء الثاني-

Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan
Al-Muntaqaa min Fataawaa Al-Fawzaan, Volume 2 Conveyed from Sahab net.
Translated by Aqeel Walker ( Translation Taken from )
Other subjects of interest:

Schools of Thought and Blind Following
Allegiance and Enmity
Calling to Allaah
Way of the Pious Predecessors
Partisanship and Splitting
Rectification of the Ummah
Disparagement and Refutation

2024 FatwaIslam.Com
Fatwa - Islamic Rulings - Islamic Scholars